Are the AI systems you ship and use secured at their trust boundaries?
Mapped to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025) with NIST AI RMF crosswalks. You get the gaps, the evidence an AI security review will ask for, and the full assessment to take next.
Ready to see where you stand?
You'll get a computed readiness indicator across Inventory & boundaries, User to application, Application to model, Model to data, Model to tools, Testing & response, the evidence that would answer each gap, and the full assessment to take next. Any critical gap is called out on its own, even when the overall score looks strong.
Assessment methodology: aligned to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025) and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. It reports a readiness indicator from your answers; it is not a red-team exercise, a conformity assessment or a legal classification of any AI system.
See your full results
Enter your email to unlock your readiness indicator, domain scores, top gaps, the evidence that would close them and recommended next steps.
- Overall readiness indicator and tier
- 6 domain scores with the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 mapping
- Your highest-priority gaps, critical ones flagged
- The evidence that would answer each gap
- Recommended next steps and an email copy
Your AI Security Quick Readiness Indicator
Executive summary
Domain scores
Weighted: Inventory & boundaries 15% · User to application 15% · Application to model 15% · Model to data 15% · Model to tools 20% · Testing & response 20%. Expand a domain to see the contributing questions, your answers and the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025 references they map to.
Your highest-priority gaps
Evidence that would answer each gap
What an assessor, a customer or an auditor would ask to see. Having it is the difference between a readiness indicator and a verified result.
Recommended next steps
Assessment methodology: aligned to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications (2025) and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. It reports a readiness indicator from your answers; it is not a red-team exercise, a conformity assessment or a legal classification of any AI system.
Please note: This assessment provides a readiness indicator based on the information provided. It does not constitute legal advice, a conformity assessment, or a determination of an AI system's legal classification, which should be confirmed with qualified counsel.
Recommended full assessment: AI Security Readiness Assessment
AI systems introduce trust boundaries the security programme never modelled: user to application, application to model, model to retrieval store, model to tools, and tools to external systems. Prompt injection, data leakage, tool misuse and model supply chain risk live on those boundaries. 30 minutes to scope. No obligation.